Get notified in an email every time a new episode of The Great Security Debate drops, or when we announce in-person episode recordings (coming soon)! Sign up for our newsletter: https://newsletter.greatsecuritydebate.net

Dan, Brian, and Erik find themselves debating whether or not the new up-to-$10M reward for information regarding ransomware and other attacks will make a material difference in the upward trend in technology as a weapon.

• What are some non-technical examples of ransomware (hint: it involves warm weather islands and boats and flags with skulls)
• How will the new ransomware bounty work? Will it work at all?
• Who sets the definition of “minimum viable security?” Who should and who can set that definition?
• Can we get beyond human nature to take advantage of a situation that is beneficial to them?
• What other economic impacts take place if we can eliminate bad actors (other than a lot of out-of-work security practitioners?)

Tune in and enjoy this episode of The Great Security Debate. Please let us know your thoughts by leaving rating feedback in your podcast app, and/or sending us an email to feedback@greatsecuritydebate.net. Thanks for listening!

Support The Great Security Debate

Links:

• Watch Black Sails Online: Stream Full Series on STARZ – Free Trial
• The Lost Pirate Kingdom | Netflix Official Site
• $10 Million Reward Offered for Information on Ransomware Attacks – The New York Times
• Cybersecurity and the Curse of Binary Thinking
• Watch Charlie Wilson’s War | Prime Video
• The FBI’s Advice on Ransomware: Don’t Pay, but Tell Us if You Do – WSJ (Subscription required)
• SEC.gov | Office of the Whistleblower
• The Great Security Debate Episode 24: Back to Basics